Military Epidemics, Then and Now: Smallpox and COVID-19.

We compared the COVID-19 experience in the first year of the current pandemic in the US with the smallpox experience of the 18th century, focusing on the US military but recognizing civilian and military populations are not separate and distinct. Despite the epidemics being separated by 21/2 centuries and with great advancements in technology having occurred over that time, we observed similarities which led us to several conclusions: • Infectious disease outbreaks will continue to occur and novel agents, naturally occurring or manipulated by humans, will threaten military and civilian populations nationally and globally. • Infectious disease outbreaks can affect both military and civilian populations, persist for long periods, and be catastrophic to military peacetime and wartime operations. • Effective surveillance is a prerequisite for early identification and subsequent meaningful responses to novel and reemerging threat agents and diseases. • Socio-cultural, religious, or political factors may limit the implementation of effective interventions in military or civilian populations. Public health officials must assess impediments to implementation of interventions and develop plans to overcome them.

Vaccination in the 19th century in Italy and the role of the catholic church in public health: a historical overview.

Using the case of the vaccine against smallpox as an example, this article explores how the attitude and the politics of the Vatican State towards vaccination changed between the 18th and 19th century. Despite some notable exceptions, the Catholic Church became progressively involved in supporting vaccination in Italy, exerting its temporal and spiritual authority to develop healthcare policies and to convince a population that still considered the vaccine as potentially harmful. The brief historical overview on vaccine and vaccination shows that during the XIX century the Catholic church and in particular, the political decision of the Pope, engaged temporal and spiritual power, high authority and persuasive influence to encourage the population, more than anyone the hesitant people, to get vaccine against smallpox. Although with the due differences determined by the path of time and by the scientific, educational and social advances of modern-day, this view from the past can provide us, with actual COVID pandemic, a reason of deep thinking and also how to face the present COVID-19 pandemic and to prepare for forcoming future. Actually, it shows us how the terrible smallpox epidemic was handled and finally overcome, thanks to vaccination.

Historical review: Towards the 50th anniversary of the last major smallpox outbreak (Yugoslavia, 1972).

In 1972, Yugoslavia experienced the largest outbreak of smallpox in the history of Europe following the Second World War and its first smallpox outbreak after 1930. The origin of the infection is believed to be a pilgrim who visited countries in the Middle East. In this epidemic in Yugoslavia, from 16th February to 11th April 1972, a total of 175 people fell ill, 35 (20%) of whom died. Measures against the outbreak were based on the strategy that was common in the final phase of the smallpox eradication program. It started with active surveillance and rapid identification of new cases. Measures, such as mass vaccination and quarantine of direct contacts, were promptly taken. In a few weeks, 18 million people had been vaccinated and approximately 15,000 had been quarantined. Yugoslavia was declared free of smallpox on 9th May 1972. The global community today is confronted with serious threats from infectious diseases, which can appear as outbreaks and pandemics.

America's Original Immunization Controversy: The Tercentenary of the Boston Smallpox Epidemic of 1721.

The CoVID-19 pandemic marks the 300th anniversary of the Boston smallpox epidemic of 1721, America's first immunization controversy. Puritan minister Cotton Mather learned of inoculation for smallpox from Onesimus, a man enslaved to him. When the disease broke out in May 1721, Mather urged Boston's physicians to inoculate all those vulnerable to the disease. Zabdiel Boylston, alone among his colleagues, decided to proceed with the procedure, igniting a heated debate that occasionally grew violent. The division between the advocates and detractors of inoculation were as deep as religion and politics. Puritan ministers supported inoculation, asserting their right to control the lives of their flock. Challenging them were a secular class of medical professionals that proclaimed primacy in medical matters. The controversy was inflamed by a nascent newspaper industry eager to profit from the fear of contagion and the passionate debate. Despite the furor and physical risk to himself and his family Boylston inoculated 282 persons, of whom only 6 died (2.1%). Of the 5759 townspeople who contracted smallpox during the epidemic, there were 844 deaths (14.7%). In America's first effort at preventive medicine Boylston established the efficacy of inoculation, which helped support its acceptance in England, and later in the century, the adoption of Edward Jenner's technique of vaccination in 1796.

Smallpox in Santiago, Concepcion and Santafe: A Comparisson of the Enlightened Sanitary Strategies (1782-1807) / Viruela en Santiago, Concepción y Santafé: comparación de las estrategias higienistas ilustradas (1782-1807) / Varíola em Santiago, Concepcion e Santafe: Um comparisson das estratégias sanitárias esclarecidas (1782-1807)

Introducción: este artículo pretende estudiar las medidas tomadas en las epidemias de viruela de Santiago (1787), Concepción (1789) y Santafé (1782/1802), para compararlas y entender cómo el estudio de estas epidemias nos puede dar luces para el abordaje del reto de salud pública actual: la pandemia de covid-19. Desarrollo: el artículo está dividido en tres partes: en la primera se exponen las medidas de higiene que se tomaron para subsanar y prevenir estas epidemias, previas a la llegada de la vacunación, comparando el rol desempeñado por los actores locales en cada región; en la segunda se relata y se compara el proceso de llegada y búsqueda de la vacuna contra la viruela en cada territorio, y en la tercera se reflexiona brevemente sobre la pandemia actual. Conclusiones: en el análisis comparativo, se destaca la manera en la que la agenda transcolonial incluye una serie de similitudes para su aplicación en cada territorio, pero también las diferencias que los procesos locales y transcoloniales plantean para su domesticación en cada uno de ellos. Además, se resaltan las particularidades que ha tenido la pandemia de covid-19 y las lecciones que este estudio de caso deja para pensar en la necesidad de enfrentarla desde una perspectiva global.

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate and compare measures implemented during the smallpox epidemics in Santiago (1787), Concepción (1789), and Santafé (1782/1802). In addition, we also tried to understand how the study of these epidemics could help identify an approach for managing the current public health challenge, i.e., the covid-19 pandemic. Development: The article is divided into three parts: the first part studies the hygienic measures that were taken to face and prevent the epidemics as well as compares the role played by local actors in each region; the second part studies the processes of searching and acquiring smallpox vaccine in Santafé and Santiago; and the third part reflects on the current pandemic scenario. Conclusions: Through comparative analysis, we evaluated the similarities in the application of transcolonial agenda in each territory and the differences brought about by local and transcolonial processes implemented for its domestication. Furthermore, we highlighted particular processes conducted for managing and treating covid-19 as well as lessons learnt from this case study about the need of dealing with covid-19 from a global perspective.

Introdução: este artigo tem como objetivo estudar as medidas tomadas nas epidemias de varíola de Santiago (1787), Concepción (1789) e Santafé (1782/1802), compará-las e compreender como o estudo des-sas epidemias pode lançar luz sobre a abordagem do desafio atual da saúde pública: a pandemia covid-19. Desenvolvimento: o artigo está dividido em três partes: na primeira, são expostas as medidas de higiene que foram tomadas para corrigir e prevenir estas epidemias, antes da chegada da vacinação, comparando o papel desempenhado pelos atores locais em cada região; na segunda, relaciona-se e compara-se o processo de chegada e busca da vacina contra a varíola em cada território; e, na terceira, faz uma breve refle-xão sobre a atual pandemia. Conclusões: na análise comparativa, destacamos a forma como a agenda transcolonial suscita uma série de semelhanças para a sua aplicação em cada território, mas também as diferenças que os processos locais e transcoloniais colocam para a sua domesticação em cada um deles. Além disso, destacamos as particularidades que a pandemia covid-19 teve e as lições que este estudo de caso deixa para pensar a necessidade de enfrentá-la a partir de uma perspectiva global.

The Smallpox Epidemics in America in the 1700s and the Role of the Surgeons: Lessons to be Learned During the Global Outbreak of COVID-19.

Today's COVID-19 pandemic offers many similarities with previous pandemics hitting our country. In particular, the smallpox epidemics during the 1700s threatened the lives of multitudes and created panic and fear in the society, similar to the situation caused by the coronavirus. Remedies that were instituted, especially inoculations, were met with opposition and even violence when first introduced. The newspapers were filled with headlines reflecting the disputes. There was a "six feet rule" during the smallpox epidemics, although it had a different meaning than today. Politicians and other leaders of the society were engaged in the war against the infection. Boston became involved in the fight against the smallpox by Dr. Zabdiel Boylston's and Rev. Cotton Mather's introduction of inoculations. When George Washington realized the benefits of the procedure and ordered mass inoculations of the Continental Army, it became an important factor in winning not only the fight against smallpox but the Revolutionary War as well. Looking back at history, realizing that we have survived previous outbreaks of devastating diseases, can provide hope during the current pandemic.

Fatal Infectious Epidemics in Iran in the Last Two Centuries; What Lessons Can We Learn from Preceding Outbreaks? A Brief Historical Review.

In the past two centuries, several fatal infectious outbreaks have arisen in Iran. Presented here is a brief historical account of four fatal epidemics including cholera, plague, Spanish influenza of 1918 and smallpox between1796 and 1979. The lessons from these outbreaks could be helpful for better combatting other deadly epidemics including the present-day disastrous COVID-19 pandemic.